When you write a poem, do you plan it out ahead of time, or do you just find your inspiration and ride it like a mechanical bull until it throws you off?
We were talking about inspiration today, and how we get there, and I realized that my habits have changed a bit. I used to have to drink red wine and listen to classic rock for a while, and then the muse struck me. Once it did, I had no idea where the poem was going. Often it went places that were inexplicable (and not always in a good way).
Now I tend to go into a poem with 3-5 things I want to accomplish. I'm not sure about the execution, but I know that there will be a Dalmatian, salami, some kind of firearm, a belt buckle, and a pair of fishnets. It's like a game. Find room for all of these things. I ask friends to give me items to work into a poem, and then I get on it. I still end up surprising myself, thankfully.
I've never written a poem that I plotted out ahead of time. How does that work?
*
In honor of the golden ripe bananas above, here are some tidbits.
The second issue of Weave has a fine lineup. You can even read some of the poems as a preview.
I talk about my idea of heaven in this interview with 32 Poems.
Lost? Confused? Pre-order your copy of Map of the Folded World today.
A new chapbook by one of the most beautiful creatures ever to walk the earth. Try not to swoon, okay? I'm warning you.
PS--Those bananas are not golden or ripe.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Charleston gratitude and overdue update
I've been good about keeping things updated over on my website, but not as successful in updating this dear old blog. Many apologi...
-
I've been good about keeping things updated over on my website, but not as successful in updating this dear old blog. Many apologi...
-
Are there certain things that you will never do in a poem, either intentionally or unintentionally? Are there things that you won't wri...
-
I don't think I'm alone in saying that poets are often the most in love with their current work. At least that's the case w...
8 comments:
I usually have about three or four lines in my head before I sit down to write, but once those lines hit the page, I'm usually surprised where the poem winds up. I don't like planning out a poem...it seems too much like writing an outline for a novel and takes the spontaneity out of it. For me, anyway.
I conceive of poems as three-dimensional (or maybe four-dimensional) geometric structures.
As a poem starts to take shape, I also will get a few things in mind that I want in the poem -- thin grass on low sloping ground, a pine bluff across a narrow channel on a northern lake, sitting in a room talking with a friend ten years ago, early bird sounds outside the window, a radio news report last week about the military, etc.
These things exist in relation to each other, in connection with each other, in time and space, and these connections form a geometric shape. As the poem starts to come to me little by little, or sometimes almost all at once, I begin to sense the geometric shape of the poem.
Once I can feel the complete geometry of it -- it might be only a quick flicker or glimpse, the way a landscape is briefly illuminaed by lightning -- at that point, the poem is ready to start writing it down.
I don't necessarily have the whole poem planned out ahead of time, though I often will let it take shape, exist and form in the silence before words, for a while before I start writing it down.
I don't normally work in multiple drafts. Usually I start by writing the first line, and I keep going line by line, crossing out and rewriting if I need to as I go. If I get to a point where I'm not sure what comes next, usually I'll let the poem sit till I know what next is.
I may need to wait an hour or two, or a day or two, or weeks or months, or once in a while years. I have poems that I've let sit, half-finished, for ten or twelve years, going back and looking at them for a few minutes frequently, sometimes almost daily, the whole time, till finally I find what the next line needs to be, and I've finished the poems. It takes concentration to do this.
Not all poems are long drawn-out like that. I also have poems that came out fully formed and complete, that I worked on for a total of 20 or 30 minutes once I started writing them down. How long or short I spend working on a poem, how much I cross out and rewrite or leave it along, appears to have nothing to do with whether the poem gets published. I've published poems that I wrote all of the above ways.
Sometimes I have something--a word, a phrase, a smell, a color, a memory, a mis-hearing of something I saw or read or listened to on a CD or whatever--in my head. Sometimes I force myself into it by pulling out books of poems from a few very different poets and fixating on one poem from each, maybe just a stanza or a line, and then playing (which sometimes means re-writing the poem in entirely reverse order--last word to first--or writing a line that remixes the ones I am looking at by including a modge podge of words from each poem, or whatever), and then putting that aside and free-writing wherever my head takes me and pushing forward.
From ONE of those two methods, I tend to get a lot of my stuff--even if it's just the trigger-stuff. Sometimes, research on something--old journals from someone not alive, the anatomy of a broccoli stem, whatever--will become trigger. And then something tends to take shape from there.
Sometimes I have actual lines in my head, or phrases, and all of that other 'play' isn't what I go to to "get me into the mood." And when I have those words stuck in my head I can tap into that little well inside me, draw a bucket of poem-water, and then mold and shape and fuss with and...
But I don't plan out poems exactly. I had too much of that in my MFA program, and in particular in one workshop. I mean, I know that if all else fails I *can* do that (5 stanzas of tersets, 2 stanzas of couplets and those will be indented in the first line, a play on the verb "jump," five references to architecture and blueprints, something all written in the third person masculine, a metaphor for rehabilitation...). And I feel, sometimes, if it seems like I am writing TOO MUCH the same poem--or the same line of thought, feeling, or questioning over and over again--that those sorts of restrictions help shake me in directions that make me fall in love with writing--and my writing--in its entirety--all over again.
My goal all semester is to write 2 poems for each week. I'm gearing up to finish this damn manuscript. With the week I have had (bronchitis, sinus infection, fever, too many meds to count...), I haven't written anything for my workshop on Monday. I need to resort, mos def, to my 'playful' and 'assignment-ish' means this weekend...
Most of the time, I am triggered by something I read (books, articles, graffiti) or hear (music, conversation) or see (art, landscape, etc) - and then the poem is usually born all at once. Sometimes only parts of a poem are born - an arm, if we go with that metaphor, or just the feet. Then I have to come back and rebuild the poem until the whole baby is there.
Sorry, that seems like an abject metaphor, come to think of it.
The last thing I was inspired by was a Time Magazine article from 1964.
I enjoyed the interview. Ah, music. I'm getting a pretty decent instrumental jazz collection together. That's what I mostly like to listen to at work and while writing. My newest discoveries are Cannonball Adderley and Milt Jackson.
I usually write based on a feeling, I'd say 80% of the time I get a strong feeling from an experience: a noise, an image, a sound, and write it out. The other 20% of the time I hear a phrase, and that phrase demands to be grown up into a big boy poem. :)
That picture offends me.
i wonder why people say "that guy went bananas"?
are bananas inherently crazy?
word verification for today: unlodi
Post a Comment